This assignment requires strict APA 7 style and a citation of 2 sources: Insane by Roth and Criminal Justice and Mental Health by Jada Hector and David Khey (must be used in reference page). Below you will find the rubrics and instructions. In no less than two full pages and no more than three pages (ideally shooting for about 1-1.5 pages per question), address the question(s) below.
After completing the week’s readings, answer the following: (1) Re: Hector & Khey Chapter 9. Short reading, so do some extra digging. What are the mental health resources on WSU campus and in the community where you live? What are some points of pride and areas for improvement?
&
(2) Re: Roth Chapter 9. What could/should a better mental health care system look like? Suggest some concrete ideas for systemic change.
—
See the rubric for details about grading.
Content will reflect your deep engagement with the readings.
Writing will reflect your attention to detail and *formatting.
*Formatting should follow APA 7th ed, including double spacing your answer, standard 1″ margins, 12pt font, and should be uploaded by Friday at 11:59 pm. Make sure to appropriately cite the chapters as you write; hint: I’m looking to see you directly cite, NEVER directly quote, but rather I want to see you paraphrase in your own words what you have learned. Do NOT include an Abstract.
Perfect format will include a title page, body of the paper, and references page; hint, create a formatted paper for your first assignment and then use that as a template for the rest of the semester.
APA 7th sample paper with formatting: LINK (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
MCJ 6250 Paper Rubric
MCJ 6250 Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
3 pts
Fully and accurately answered the question(s). Demonstrated content knowledge and breadth of learning by including content from assigned readings in answer. Stayed on point without including irrelevant information in answer.
2 pts
Shows understanding of the material, but the answer may not address all parts of the question. Parts of the answer may be incorrect, vague, or off topic.
1 pts
Answer is incorrect and does not demonstrate mastery of the material or that the assigned readngs informed the answer.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
2 pts
Writing was grammatically correct; followed instructions regarding length.
1 pts
Instructions related to format, length or grammar not followed fully. Partial credit depending on the scope of the problem.